The Drone Ranger: Obamas Dirty Wars
About the time Barack Obama ordered the drone strike that killed Abdul-Rahman al-Awlaki, the 16-year-old American kid Facebooked his second-rate choice of hip-hop favorites. I say “second-rate,” because Abdul was my son’s age almost exactly, so I know the kind of crap they listen to.
From Greg Palast Originally for Vice Magazine
Every Tuesday, President Obama personally checks off the names of people he wants killed. George Bush, a bit more squeamish than Obama, never did that; but Mr. Obama felt those decisions were the president’s responsibility: he want[s] to keep his own finger on the trigger,” according to one report. A tidy, scheduled man, the President only picks his victims once a week, now called “Terror Tuesday.”
On October 14, 2011, in Shabwah province, Yemen, Abdul, went out with his cousins and friends for a good old US-style barbecue, when Obama’s drone fired a rocket, blowing the teenager to pieces. Or I should say “piece.” All that was left of Abdul was a piece of skull with long curly hair that allowed his relatives to identify this hunk of his head by his US-type haircut.
Obama didn’t order the killings (Abdul’s friends and cousins died too) as a random act of crazy. No-Drama Obama doesn’t believe in random. Abdul’s problem was that his father was Anwar al-Awlaki. Obama killed Abdul’s dad as well. Daddy al-Awlaki, an American imam who voted for George Bush, had gone over to the side of the bad guys, and after leaving the USA, broadcast pro-terrorism radio reports from Arabia.
We can argue until the cows come home about whether Daddy al-Awlaki was a legitimate kill target. It is, after all, right there in the US Constitution that the penalty for treason is death. I suppose that, before executing him, a jury trial would have been nice. But nice was not going to happen. So, OK, Barack, we’ll let that one go.
But what about the 16-year-old? Obama didn’t even pretend that the kid was a terrorist, or terrorist in-the-making, nor adopting in any way his father’s crazed kill-Americans crusade.
What could justify execution of Abdul? When asked, then-White House press spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said, “I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father”
I guess he should have.
Obama’s minions tried to cover up the hit on the teenagers. Attorney General Eric Holder informed Congress of the killings by writing that U.S. drones had blown up Anwar al-Awlaki, the crazy cleric and three other Americans who “were not specifically targeted.”
Holder’s comment makes it seem that Awlaki’s son was blown up with him—a sad case of ‘collateral damage.’
But are you ready for this? The teenager—along with his cousin and friends—was killed two weeks after and hundreds of miles away from the site where rockets killed his father.
Obama’s Seal Team Sick
I was straightened out on the facts by Richard Rowley, America’s most courageous investigative reporter. Rowley filmed, directed and edited the brilliant, horrific, and brilliantly horrific documentary Dirty Wars, previewing this week in the US.
The film centers on Rowley’s reporting partner, the indefatigable Jeremy Scahill, whom Rowley follows from the scene of a massacre at a wedding party in Afghanistan to an interview with a warlord in Mogadishu (while under sniper fire).
You might know Rowley as Ricardo, the pathologically calm cameraman portrayed in my book Vultures’ Picnic. In Iraq, Rowley covered the US Army assault on Fallujah “embedded” with the assaulted, the insurgents. That was insane. Insane but brilliant. (Our producer at BBC warned Ricardo that he was one lucky cat, but he’d already used up seven of his nine lives.)
In Dirty Wars, Rowley and Scahill reveal that drones are just one toy in our Presidents’ murderous toy-chest. And the kill list is far larger than even a smart dude like Obama can tick off on a Tuesday. Scahill calculates that the targeted kills in Afghanistan and Pakistan now total more than 17,000!
Drones can’t kill them all. In 2009, a US cruise missile hit al Majala, a remote village of Bedouins in Yemen, killing a dozen herdsmen and three babies. Yemen’s President Ali Abdullah Saleh took responsibility, proudly, for killing supposed “terrorists.”
However, a courageous Yemeni reporter, Abdulelah Haider Shaye, visited the site, photographed the remains of the US missile—and was promptly jailed.
The US is particularly shy about taking credit for the cruise missile kills as it boosted al Qaeda’s recruitment drive in Yemen.
Rowley and Scahill are the only US reporters to have gone to the Bedouin village and filmed the missile casing—cold evidence confirming the US had entered a war without any legal declaration—-indeed, in complete secrecy.
Scahill also revealed that, while Yemen’s President Saleh was nervous about keeping the reporter imprisoned, Saleh withdrew his pardon at the personal request of Barack Obama. Obama wanted the journalist not just silenced, but punished.
Wiki-Leaks: Cleaning up Dirty Wars
I was curious: Did Scahill and Rowley make use of Wiki-Leaks?
“Wiki-Leaks was absolutely indispensible,” Rowley told me, a treasure trove of State Department confessions confirming what they found on the ground. It was through Wiki-Leaks that they discovered that President Saleh joked with US operatives about lying to his Congress about the US missile attack on al Majala.
And it was in Wiki-Leaks that Scahill found the warlord Indha Adde—a.k.a. “White Eyes” was on the USA’s payroll. I should say, General White Eyes–a rank he gave himself in the Somali Army by pinning three stars on his jacket. Where did the US military find this cutthroat? Previously, the Wiki-Leaks cables revealed, the US knew he was the protector of the al Qaeda bombers that blew up the US Embassy in Nairobi.
Rowley captures the warlord/general on camera saying, “The USA is the master in war”—quite a compliment from a natural born killer like White Eyes.
And General “Eyes” is quite right. The Drone Ranger’s secret war has now spread to 75 nations. It’s all under the command of General William H. McRaven.
The US press is in love with McRaven, lauded as the man who planned the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound. But there’s not one single US network or paper that would report on Scahill’s discovery that McRaven was also the guy who planned the night raid on the Afghan wedding party that killed the bride, the groom and the groom’s mother.
Maybe that was some horrible mistake. But McRaven’s crew, called “The American Taliban” by Afghans, made sure that no one would finger the US: Rowley and Scahill obtained a secretly recorded video of McRaven’s commandoes slicing the bullets out of the bride’s and groom’s bodies to prevent their killers’ identification.
McRaven’s semi-private army, the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), is warring in our name worldwide in nations he won’t name and Obama will arrest you for naming. Not even Orwell could have dreamed up that one.
I asked about the value of Wiki-Leaks to Rowley and Scahill because of the ongoing trial of Pvt. Bradley Manning and the impending capture of Edward Snowden, the contractor willing to blow away his career and freedom to let you know that nice Mr. Obama has been spying on you.
A rabbi from Nazareth once said, “The truth shall make you free.” And that’s exactly what Obama is afraid of: faced with the truths revealed in Dirty Wars, they know most Americans would cut themselves free of McRaven’s Seal Team Sick.
I am convinced the hit on al-Awlaki’s son was meant to teach a lesson, If you want to be a martyr, we’ll make your son and your mom and daughter martyrs too.
Such terror-for-terror can be, I’ll admit, quite effective. During the Ronald Reagan years, that gutless faux-cowboy President sent weapons to Ayatollah Khomeini in return for the release of hostages taken by Hezbollah. The Russians got their hostages home another way. The USSR didn’t accept an arms-for-hostage deal. Rather, the KGB systematically assassinated the hostage-takers’ cousins, mothers and brothers one by one—until Hezbollah released all the Russian hostages.
By rocketing the children of those we fear, we are indeed teaching them a lesson. But what are they learning?
Next year, Malia Obama turns 16. I hope we never hear that harm has come to Malia while some chuckling spokesman for al Qaeda says, “She should have had a far more responsible father.”
* * * * * * * *
Greg Palast’s films with Richard “Ricardo” Rowley for BBC Television and Democracy Now! are available on the DVD, Palast Investigates: From 8-Mile to the Amazon – On the Trail of Financial Marauders. This week, you can download it here without charge from the Palast Investigative Fund or simply make a contribution to keep our work alive!
Locate screenings of Dirty Wars near you.
Read Ricardo’s story in Palast’s highly acclaimed book Vultures’ Picnic.
Greg Palast is also author of the New York Times bestsellers Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal an Election in 9 Easy Steps, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse.
Subscribe to Palast’s Newsletter and podcasts.
Follow Palast on Facebook and Twitter.
Perhaps what might be unsettling to some, is that the two Obama administration in many ways may end up becoming worse than the Bush Administrations in terms of secretive wars and domestic surveillance. That being said, the current admin is merely advancing the former admin policies. How else would Cheney and Obama find anything to agree upon?
Stuff such as this should be an obvious wake-up call for those who haven’t yet figured out that the American left-right/D-R illusion is just that. Oh they save their little pet issues like abortion and marriage and taxes to squabble over to make people think they’re at odds…but when it comes down to the basic functionality of government, and how it protects and serves itself (not you), they are in virtual lockstep.
I. personally, have as much trouble with reporters/journalists who take the color red, mix it with winter rain, and declare it is –definitely!– unquestionable proof that All the scenes in Forrest Gump actually happened as shown, as I am with reporters/journalists who take the same color red, mix it with the same winter rain, and declare IT is –definitely!– unquestionable proof that None of the events in Forrest Gump actually happened.
I also take exception to reporters/journalists who insist on guilt by association; take “reportedly said” and “alleged” as direct-source traceable, confirmable, 100% truthful and accurate; and who seem to (willfully or inadvertently) ignore mitigating factor(s) surrounding the event(s) the article/story focuses on.
I realize I’m getting right cranky in my old age, but I’m getting mighty tired of ‘news’ that’s so far skewed to either side of the left-right spectrum that it loses even the slightest hint of being ‘unbiased’ in telling/exposing issues. Because In the telling/exposing, no matter the over-all truthfulness –or, more to the point, lack thereof– of the telling, a ‘legitimacy’ is given…no, bestowed. A legitimacy that becomes, all on its own, gospel; gospel by the mere fact that it has been ‘shared’ with masses of people. This nation, anymore, operates on sound-bites, on snippets of that gospel; rightly or wrongly, that’s just the way it is. And one thing I know for sure: Once a bell has been rung, it can’t be unrung. Ever.
OK — just had to get that off my heart. I’ll step down off of my soapbox now. beth.
Dirty Wars is at the IFC Film Center in Manhattan this week (still have trouble not calling it the Waverly), and I just asked a neighbor if he wants to see it Thursday.
We went. It’s an amazing, exciting, and troubling film. See it when you can.